
Version 1.2b, December 1999*, by Baxil (version 
history) A text-only version is available. 
Link here
( draconity.com/faq ).  Simple, memorable. 
Other languages
 Several dragons and dragon-friends around the world have translated this FAQ into their native language:
    
Español 
    
|
    
Deutsch 
    
|
    
Россию
    
|
    
Polski
 
 Also probably others I haven't seen, or have forgotten about.  
 Contact me if you find (or write) another translation.
Do these
four words describe you or someone you know? If so, chances are good
that you're curious about what that statement really means.
Many
people wonder about the psychological basis for draconity. Perhaps
you're concerned about the spiritual implications of calling oneself a
dragon. Or what sort of community resources are available.
In this
document, I would like to try to address all these concerns in a
straightforward and informative way. Whether you're coming to terms
with your own draconity, or concerned about a friend or relative who
is, I hope you find this useful.
 
If you have a question 
  (specific or general) that is not answered in this FAQ, please refer to the 
  "Contact/Copyright Information" section at the bottom 
  of the document. All sincere inquiries are welcome. 
 
Dragons are mythic creatures 
      (see "What do dragons mean to you?" below) found 
      in the legends and stories of almost every civilization. There are two major 
      types: Western dragons, which are associated with reptiles, and are often 
      seen as guards of great treasure or tests of a hero's strength in their 
      culture's legends; and Eastern dragons, which are characterized physically 
      as amalgams of many different creatures and are associated with the powers 
      of nature. 
    
 
A far more detailed 
      account of the different types of dragons and their stories and symbolism 
      can be found in the alt.fan.dragons FAQ at http://www.dragonfire.org/IndexFAQ.html 
      or at Jen Walker's "What Is a Dragon?" page at http://www.draconian.com/whatis/. 
    
 
It is a statement of 
      identity. "I am a dragon" means that one has chosen to acknowledge dragons 
      as an important part of their life -- as a social group, as a way of looking 
      at themselves, as a way of looking at the world. 
    
 
Beyond that, it is up 
      to each individual person what to make of their draconity. Many draw strength 
      from this identity in everyday life, but some submerge it in order to deal 
      with the human world. A few treat their draconity with such importance that 
      they identify only as dragons even to strangers; many will answer to both 
      their human and dragon names in public; some only feel comfortable with 
      their draconity among close friends. 
    
 
Dragons are powerful 
      symbols, transcending everyday life and cutting to the heart of far deeper 
      and more eternal struggles. Whether they are good or evil -- whether they 
      embody power or wisdom -- whether they guide humanity or oppose it -- are 
      all dependent on culture and personal worldview. 
    
 
This is because dragons 
      are mythic creatures. Myths are stories that are profoundly true and have 
      deep impact on believers' lives(1), like Jesus' death 
      and resurrection, Hindu creation stories, or the Big Bang theory. Regardless 
      of whether or not they are objectively true, myths are certainly 
      true to their believers, and answer fundamental questions about the nature 
      of the universe. 
    
 
Draconity, in its own 
      way, is just an encompassing a myth as any of those listed above. Because 
      there is no single standard of a "proper dragon," its answers, truths and 
      consequences vary from person to person, but there is one thing for certain: 
      they are big. 
    
 
Because that's 
      what we are. ]B=8) 
    
 
Draconity is certainly 
      a different belief to the average person, but it's important 
      to keep in mind that different and crazy are not the same. Liking garlic 
      ice cream (it exists!) is different. Pulling out an AK-47 at the local McDonald's 
      is crazy. I do not know any crazy dragons. 
    
 
In general, one of the 
      greatest struggles that dragons have to go through is coming to terms with 
      their draconity, simply because it is such a different worldview. Embracing 
      it means confronting many doubts and demons, often completely alone. It 
      is far easier for someone to ignore the question of their draconity than 
      it is for them to deal with it honestly. Therefore, accepting one's inner 
      dragon requires high self-esteem and inner peace -- two qualities that truly 
      crazy people lack. 
    
 
They certainly can, 
      but not all do. Dragons are so far removed from the accepted paradigm that 
      most people haven't even seriously considered their existence, but many 
      are tolerant enough to approach the idea objectively once it's presented. 
      My friends (and parents!) have all come to terms with my draconity, and 
      I've explained the situation to many strangers with favorable receptions. 
      (Other dragons haven't been nearly as lucky, and my heart goes out to the 
      ones whose parents won't accept them.) 
    
 
Opinions vary from individual 
      to individual, and depend largely on culture, upbringing, willingness to 
      listen, and level of ingrained skepticism. A common attitude I've seen is 
      that someone can't personally believe in dragons, but accepts that I believe 
      I am one -- which works for me; as long as they respect my view of reality 
      I am quite willing to respect theirs. 
    
 
Of course, whether draconity 
      is accepted or rejected by "the mainstream" does not make it any more or 
      less real. The only opinion that counts, for your reality, is yours. 
    
 
Escapism is the adopting 
      of a particular belief in order to avoid confronting the harsher side of 
      reality. The very act of accepting one's draconity involves mental struggle; 
      proclaiming one's draconity to friends and relatives often results in estrangement; 
      and there is no "fantasy world" that a dragon can hide in -- on the contrary, 
      dragons have the added difficulty of trying to fit into human society as 
      a spiritual outsider. Where is the escapism? 
    
 
Escapism can also indicate 
      a lack of introspection, an unwillingness to face oneself. And here, too, 
      draconity is not escapist. Instead, denying one's draconic 
      heritage -- abandoning truth to avoid social and inner conflict -- is escapism, 
      and someone going through the struggle of finding his or her inner dragon 
      doesn't need the condescension of others who don't understand that draconity's 
      an uphill battle. 
    
 
Yes -- in the same way 
      that one can "believe" they are Lithuanian or Catholic or heterosexual. 
      Draconity is an identity. We choose to accept that part of us which we identify 
      as draconic. Do we ultimately choose to be dragons, or is it something that 
      is predetermined? I don't know. 
    
 
Also see next 
      question. 
    
 
This is the question 
      that most people mean when they ask "Do you really believe you're a dragon?" 
      -- and there is a misconception that all people aspiring to draconity expect 
      someday to sprout wings and scales. This is not universally true. 
    
 
Many people are dragons 
      spiritually, and that (more or less) abstract connection is as far as it 
      ever gets. There are also those in the dragon community who believe that 
      in this life they are humans, but in the past they have been dragons, and 
      that draconity is a "more natural" form for them. Of course, there are dragons 
      who expect within this lifetime to regain dragon form, and there is not 
      anything wrong with that, either. 
    
 
Unfortunately, there's 
      no simple answer to this -- no tests you can take, no card you can dig out 
      of your wallet. The only way to tell is to look, long and hard, at yourself 
      and to come to a decision on your own. Don't take shortcuts, and don't trust 
      anyone who says otherwise: how much meaning your draconity has is proportional 
      to how much effort you put into it. 
    
 
Ask yourself: Am I aspiring 
      to draconity because it's right rather than cool? Do I have a real 
      perspective on what it means to be a dragon? Would I be able to accept that 
      I'm not a dragon if the evidence I find says so? Is draconity a consistent 
      explanation with all of the evidence I have found so far? Is it the best 
      explanation? If you can't answer any of the above, answered "no" to any 
      of them, or are anything less than 100 percent sure of your draconity (and 
      if you're convinced, why are you reading this question? :-)), then take 
      some time out to evaluate. 
    
 
It's perfectly OK to 
      not be sure; I told people "I think I am a dragon" for half a decade before 
      I found out enough to know. And don't rush yourself. Draconity 
      is a beautiful destination on the road of self-discovery -- enjoy the journey! 
    
 
There are many people 
      out there who consider their dragon to be only part of, or separate from, 
      their human self -- a distinct facet of their personality, or an "avatar" 
      which they are spiritually in touch with, or an outside identity with which 
      they communicate and have bonded. 
    
 
As I consider my dragon 
      to be not only me but all of me, I have written this FAQ from that 
      worldview. But I am not trying to exclude those whose dragons play different 
      roles in their life! Many of the questions in this FAQ apply no matter what 
      your relationship with your dragon may be. Some questions (and answers) 
      may apply more specifically to the way I perceive draconity, so if any of 
      my writing rubs you the wrong way, please feel free to talk to me personally 
      (see "Contact Information" at the bottom of this 
      document). 
    
(Also see "What's the deal with 'dragon magic'?" below.)
 
The answer would seem 
      obvious at first: Would we be proud of our draconity if the answer were 
      "no"? 
    
 
But this is a very shallow 
      look at the issue. There are many things which humans excel at, and just 
      because dragons are proud of their heritage doesn't mean that they can't 
      recognize the beauty of human life. True dragons don't maintain their identity 
      to reject humanity -- they insist on their draconity because it better fits 
      them. 
    
 
Speaking personally, 
      during my last life as a dragon I snuck into a local human town on a weekly 
      basis to buy books, and I have always been fascinated by human music. (You 
      should see my CD collection!) I would not be ashamed to be a human, and 
      sometimes (like when I read Loren Eiseley) I envy you. However, I am a dragon. 
      It's not better than humanity, but different. And far better for me. 
    
 
Just because dragons 
      haven't been proved to exist in the physical world doesn't mean that they 
      hold no claim on reality. Consider the variety of cultures, both Eastern 
      and Western, in our world that have dragons in their mythology -- and the 
      lack of cultures that don't. How can we explain this prevalence of dragons 
      in myth? Is it any more plausible to say "early racial memories of dinosaurs" 
      (we're talking tree-shrew early, since dinosaurs haven't existed for 65 
      million years) than to consider dragons as real? 
    
 
But the question of 
      whether dragons are physically real doesn't make a difference in the end. 
      Dragons are mythic creatures (see "What are dragons?") 
      -- and, therefore, are exceptionally real beings to those who choose to 
      accept the myth. That acceptance is a matter of faith ... the same faith 
      that drives people to turn to Christianity or to scientific skepticism (yes, 
      even being a skeptic requires faith -- faith that everything can be neatly 
      parceled up, explained and understood, a faith which not everyone shares). 
    
 
We do love being dragons. 
      It means a lot to us. Otherwise we wouldn't acknowledge it. 
    
 
"Taking it too far" 
      is a judgment value, and the question that hinges on is: "Why do you believe 
      in something which I can't accept as real?" The only possible answer to 
      that question is "Because it is true to me." 
    
 
Draconity is an issue 
      of identity, and being acknowledged as a dragon by others is important to 
      that identity. A name is the most direct and obvious way of accomplishing 
      this. If someone prefers to go by their dragon name, refusing to use it 
      can be just as insulting as insisting on calling the pope "John." 
    
 
This is not an issue 
      of validation, however, nor is it an issue of rejecting humanity (see "Do 
      you consider dragons superior to humans?" above). Many dragons see their 
      dragon name as more fitting or more meaningful than their human name, which 
      after all is rather arbitrary. For example, "Baxil" means "beloved" in a 
      dragon tongue, and as such it is a powerful word for me. Also, a dragon 
      name can be a strong reminder of someone's commitment to their draconity, 
      in the same way that a convert to Islam may take a new name (e.g. Cassius 
      Clay / Muhammad Ali). 
    
 
We are only a group 
      in name and have no fixed dogma. I doubt you'd ever get all of us to agree 
      on anything. ;-) In fact, I cannot claim to speak for all dragons with this 
      FAQ, and differences of opinion are certainly welcome. (See "Contact 
      Information" at the bottom of this document.) 
    
 
Dragons come from all 
      walks of life, span all ages from schoolchildren to grandparents, are widely 
      distributed geographically (no, this isn't just a California thing), and 
      in general are hard to pick out in a crowd. Speaking from experience, though, 
      I will observe that most dragons seem to be introspective individuals, many 
      of whom felt a social detachment from their peers at an early age, and many 
      of whom are either well-educated people or bright underachievers. Draconity 
      cuts across gender lines, although males apparently outnumber females (which 
      is true of just about any group on the Internet). The majority of dragons 
      are avid readers, and unsurprisingly, they seem to enjoy fantasy/science-fiction 
      novels. 
    
 
No. 
    
 
A cult is an organization, 
      usually with religious overtones, characterized by the presence of a charismatic 
      leader, a demand for unconditional acceptance of its dogma, and a focus 
      on financial support from its members. 
    
 
Being a dragon is completely 
      at odds with all of these danger signals. The dragon community has no members 
      which could rightly be called "leaders." There is nothing one must believe 
      in order to call themselves a dragon (except draconity itself, by definition). 
      And there is no place to send money to. 
    
 
We do not try to "hook" 
      gullible people into draconity. On the contrary, conversation in dragon 
      circles tends to be intellectual and social (e.g. pun wars, riddles), and 
      if people stay it is because they like the casual and friendly atmosphere 
      which characterizes all of our online correspondence. Non-dragons are always 
      welcome, and there are many humans who have been in dragon circles for years! 
      No social pressure is ever applied -- one does not have to be a dragon to 
      participate in any dragon community activities. 
    
 
Dragons are a very diverse 
      group, and if one stays for long enough they are almost certain to be exposed 
      to a wide range of beliefs, but there is no agenda we have to push upon 
      others. If someone you care about is a dragon, you can rest assured that 
      it is by their free will. 
    
 
Dragons are only a group 
      in name and have no fixed dogma. The only requirement for believing that 
      one is a dragon is to believe at some level that dragons exist (by definition). 
      There is no organization that sets standards for draconity. There are no 
      fixed rituals, no social conventions, and no necessary ethics. In short, 
      no. 
    
 
I am not aware of any 
      religions which specifically preach to dragons(2), 
      although (as might be expected) some religons appeal more to dragons than 
      others do. I suspect that the "typical dragon" has a worldview that does 
      not fit into the framework of any world religion, although one may certainly 
      be a dragon and be of various faiths. 
    
 
Believing that one is 
      a dragon does not, in itself, create incompatibilities with any religion 
      -- there is no dogma of draconity that states what you need to believe. 
      There are, of course, conflicts with some faiths, but these are caused by 
      the dogma of the religion in question, most often when the religion labels 
      dragons as inherently evil. 
    
 
To provide a specific 
      example: Christian churches that call for a literal interpretation of the 
      Bible traditionally have had problems with draconity. (See following questions.) 
    
 
Christianity, in 
          general, demands a belief in Jesus Christ as one's savior and in the 
          unity and supremacy of God. Draconity is not incompatible with either 
          of these concepts, and so being a Christian dragon is certainly possible. 
          "Praise the Lord from the earth, ye dragons, and all deeps." (Psalm 
          148:7) 
        
 
It is far simpler 
          to be a dragon, to be certain, in a liberal church. In more conservative 
          organizations, which tend to insist on a literal interpretation of the 
          Bible, draconity can be incompatible with the teachings of the institution 
          (see next question). 
        
 
Christian dragons, 
          in my experience, tend to have a very colorful and living mythology 
          that unites their conception of dragon with their conception of God. 
          One friend of mine, for example, identifies dragons as among God's angels. 
        
 
Just like everything 
          else in such a symbolically loaded book, it all depends on interpretation. 
          Dragons have typically been associated with the Antichrist mostly on 
          the strength of the book of Revelation (specifically Rev. 12:1-9, among 
          other references). However, there's considerable speculation that John 
          was writing symbolically about the Roman Empire in that passage, and 
          so the question may hinge on: Why was a dragon used as a symbol for 
          something so evil? 
        
 
Dragons are a very 
          powerful Other, instantly recognizable as something alien to humanity. 
          In a religion so centered on humanity as Christianity, this placed them 
          naturally in the role of enemies. They may have been associated with 
          the enemy simply because of the strength of their symbolism 
          and mythology and their universality. 
        
 
Of course, not all 
          references to dragons in the Bible portray them as evil. But in general, 
          Western thought has been to condemn them -- unfairly, I say. 
        
 
One either is or is 
      not a dragon, and trying to "become" one is rather like trying to change 
      sexes without the proper medical procedure. In short, people cannot "become" 
      dragons. 
    
 
However: This is not 
      to say that dragons always know who they are! Very few are born 
      with the knowledge of their inner draconity; most have to grow into it and 
      discover it. Draconity is just as legitimate if discovered late in life. 
      True draconity is not a "becoming," it is a "returning," and true dragons 
      know the difference. 
    
 
Ultimately, the 
      question boils down to "How do I know if I'm a dragon?" (answered above). 
      However, one can certainly join the dragon community whether they are a 
      dragon or not (see next question). And many members of the dragon community 
      "adopt a character" at the beginning of their stay -- but later grow to 
      find that the "character" has adopted THEM. 
    
 
All people, whether 
      they are dragons or not, are welcome to the dragon community. On the Internet, 
      this community takes the form of Usenet newsgroups (such as alt.fan.dragons 
      and, to some extent, alt.lifestyle.furry), 
      Internet Relay Chat rooms (such as Dalnet's 
      #afd channel), a tangled web of WWW pages (the AFD page, http://www.dragonfire.org, 
      is a good starting point), MUCKs (such as Alfandria at alfandria.chameleon.org, 
      port 8888), and scattered mailing lists, spin-off chat rooms and bulletin-board 
      style discussions. Nearly all of these forums are open to the public, so 
      feel free to walk in, listen for a while, and make your presence known. 
      Information on joining the newsgroups or IRC channels is available from 
      many sources, including here (which is also 
      maintained by me). 
    
 
The longer you 
      stay and the more you contribute to the community, the more your name will 
      be known. So come on in and make a difference! 
    
 
Many people's 
      first exposure to draconity is through a larger group collectively known 
      as "furries," which is a gathering of people who are (or are interested 
      in) anthropomorphic animals. Dragons are furries by default, since the term 
      applies to all beings possessing both human qualities and non-human shape 
      (whether or not they possess fur). 
    
 
However, draconity 
      did not grow out of the furry community. It is not a "new" idea, and it 
      was not developed by any one person or group, much less furries. Although 
      dragons and furries are under the same umbrella, they are not causally connected. 
    
 
Estimates vary. 
      It is certain that there are at least 500 to 1,000 worldwide -- that many 
      alone are participants in the online dragon community, mostly from the United 
      States but found anywhere that Internet cabling has been lain. 
    
 
As new dragons 
      show up all the time, it seems reasonable to assume that this figure is 
      far low of the mark. One of the more intriguing estimates I've heard is 
      that up to 600,000 people on Earth may be dragons, most unaware of it. This 
      may seem like a lot -- but keep in mind that this is only 0.01% 
      of the world's population* (one person in ten thousand), and if they all 
      moved to the United States it would still be less than 0.2% of the 
      country's population.* 
     
 
* Fixed numbers 2011/04/26 -b
    
 
All "Dragon Union" 
      jokes aside, there is no person or group which claims (or can claim) 
      to represent all dragons or all "real" dragons. One can be a dragon independent 
      of any organization, and in fact, one has to be. 
    
 
In an effort 
      to provide a centralized gathering place for dragons on the Internet, most 
      dragons recognize alt.fan.dragons, #afd, Alfandria, and the like (see "How 
      do I join the dragon community?" above) to be "official" gathering places. 
      This simply means that the online dragon community has agreed to support 
      a set of standard meeting forums in an attempt to keep the group unified. 
      There is nothing canonical about AFD/#afd/Alfandria except that they are 
      places where you will find more dragons than elsewhere. 
    
 
The dragon community, 
      in the physical world, is spread out so broadly and so thinly that it is 
      almost impossible to maintain a physical network. (For the first three to 
      four years of my personal experiences with draconity, for example, I thought 
      I was alone in my belief and probably crazy. See "How did you discover your 
      draconity?" below, for details.) 
    
 
To put it bluntly, 
      the Internet magnifies the visibility of "fringe" groups, those with nonstandard 
      beliefs. It is far easier for those with similar opinions to find each other 
      and gather together. (Draconity is nothing if not a nonstandard belief.) 
      The result is that people who might never see another dragon in the years 
      before the Information Age are suddenly discovering dozens, scores, even 
      hundreds of fellow draconics -- online. Although this often leads to increased 
      physical networking, such as regional "Dragon Gathers," the simplest way 
      to maintain contact with such a far-flung group is through the Internet. 
    
 
Often, dragons 
          feel that their beliefs and attitudes are misunderstood by everyone 
          except the dragon community -- a feeling that is unfortunately grounded 
          in reality, since many people find draconity very difficult to accept. 
          Since the dragon community is so overwhelmingly online (see previous 
          question), those parts of the Internet that are dragon-friendly can 
          start feeling, in a very real sense, like home. 
        
 
If you are 
          a physical-life friend or relative of a dragon that you are concerned 
          is spending too much time on the Internet, the first step to a solution 
          is to show increased tolerance, interest and understanding of their 
          draconity. The more understood and loved they feel offline, the less 
          they will need to fill that void on the Internet. (Do not expect them 
          to completely do without, though. Being a dragon is a very real and 
          profound force in their life, and cutting off close friendships by denying 
          them Net access can create intense alienation that destroys the rest 
          of your work.) I also recommend taking more interest in what they do 
          online -- perhaps you will discover that you approve of how they use 
          their online time. With patience and support, a happy medium can be 
          reached. 
        
 
No. All races 
      are welcome. The dragon community runs the gamut from dragons to humans 
      to wolves to gryphons, shapeshifters, fish, etc. (See "How 
      do I join the dragon community?" above.) 
    
 
Even among the 
      dragons themselves, though, there will be the unfortunate but inevitable 
      contingent of wanna-bes -- the people who don't believe they are dragons, 
      but say they are. The reasons for this vary from inaccurate understanding 
      of draconity to the need for peer acceptance to belief that dragons are 
      all role-playing anyway (which we aren't). The biggest cause of user turnover 
      in the dragon community is when people pretending to be dragons are suddenly 
      confronted by the realization that We're Not Kidding Around and quickly 
      decide that they don't need to hang out with people whose beliefs they can't 
      accept (see "Are you crazy?" above). 
    
 
(Also see "How 
      do I know if I'm a dragon?" above.) 
    
 
The question 
      of sincerity often boils down to earnestness -- people pretending to be 
      dragons haven't got as big of an investment in their identity as the true 
      dragons do. Staying power is the biggest indicator. 
    
 
Of course, it's 
      a lot easier to tell which dragons are "fakes" after one knows what "real" 
      dragons are like. Hanging around the dragon community for a few months and 
      getting to know many dragons will be invaluable in helping you to form your 
      own guidelines for dragon evaluation. 
    
 
For some idea 
      of the sort of things that you can notice with sufficient exposure to draconity, 
      you can see my list at http://www.draconity.com/faq/true-dragons.txt. 
    
 
The Dragon Purity 
      Test (aka Draconity Corruption Test, Draconity Test), which was developed 
      by Dymus in 1995 and can be found at [http://www.armory.com/tests/draconity.html], 
      is designed to measure and rank one's inner dragon through a series of questions 
      such as "Have you ever answered faster to your draconic name than your human 
      one?" 
    
 
The test itself 
      states at the top: "This test is purely for fun and entertainment. If you 
      do not feel that your score is relative to your draconity then ignore it 
      ... I warn you now that the validity of the test isn't exactly real high, 
      just fun." 
    
 
While it's true 
      that in general dragons score higher than humans, the test is also unbalanced 
      so that long-time alt.fan.dragons residents score higher than newbies, even 
      if the long-timers are non-dragons. Additionally, scoring higher does not 
      make one "more" of a dragon, nor is there a clearly defined cut-off point 
      below which no dragon can score. So, "the chief benefit of test results 
      is living in a world where they are overrated" (to paraphrase H.L. Mencken). 
    
 
Dragon magic, 
      outlined by D.J. Conway in her book Dancing With Dragons (Llewellyn 
      Publications, 1994), involves the invocation of dragon spirits to aid one 
      in one's magical work. "Invoke their ageless wisdom and power!" says one 
      of the book's cover blurbs. 
    
 
As both a dragon 
      and a practicing mage, I find Dancing With Dragons' promises 
      rather silly -- all I have to do to harness the ageless wisdom and power 
      of the dragon is to look inside myself. Still, the book's target audience 
      is, I'm sure, human, and for those people who are not themselves dragons 
      I can understand how it could aid their work. 
    
 
Be forewarned 
      that I can't claim to speak for anyone but myself on this one. Everyone's 
      story is different. 
    
 
I grew up for 
      over a decade as a human, came to realize gradually that I wasn't normal, 
      came to realize that draconity explained that lack of normality very well, 
      and gathered evidence and experiences for many years before I came to the 
      conclusion that being a dragon was the only explanation that made 
      sense in a self-consistent way. 
    
 
A more detailed 
      version of the story (and a self-analysis) are at http://www.draconity.com/faq/history.html. 
      Happy reading, and best wishes in your continued encounters with draconity! 
    
 
To contact me, e-mail 
  faq@tomorrowlands.org. (This is a 
  permanent mailing address, and should always either reach me directly or be forwarded 
  to my current location.) Due to limited Internet time and volume of mail received, 
  I cannot promise a timely reply, but I do read my mail regularly. 
 
If you have a question 
  not covered in this FAQ, put "Draconity FAQ question" (or something similar) 
  in the subject line of your message, and I will attempt to give you an answer 
  within 1-2 days. Particularly relevant questions may be added to future 
  versions of the Draconity FAQ unless you specify that the question is private. 
 
  Spam filter alert 
Like most of the Internet, only a tiny fraction of the e-mail I receive is a 
legitimate attempt to contact me.  To make
your letter stand out, please add the phrase
[TWEB] to the subject line of your e-mail. (Include the
braces.)  This will give it a pass through my spam filters.  Otherwise,
I may not notice your e-mail.
This document is © me (Tad "Baxil" Ramspott), 1998.
 
The Draconity 
FAQ by Baxil is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported 
License.  Please e-mail me if you share it with others -- I'd love to see how my thoughts spread (and let readers know what other 
languages it's available in)!
The URL of the official 
  Draconity FAQ is draconity.com/faq 
  (or www.tomorrowlands.org/draconity/faq), 
  and the text-only version is at draconity.com/faq/faq.txt. 
  If you are reading this elsewhere, what you're reading may be outdated; 
  check the listed URLs for the latest version. 
Up to draconity index  | 
  Please report errors or broken links to the webmaster via the Contact page. FAQ last updated Dec 7, 1999.  Page last updated Nov 10, 2011. 
Design © 1999-2007 Tad "Baxil" Ramspott.  |